🔗 Share this article

Itranspired the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Regarding System and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.